Note: All pictures were found on Facebook or other open-source sites. Also, please excuse some of the WordPress formatting, it is not 100% user friendly, and I’m not an expert at it.
This blog post gets into whether or not DB Cooper researchers are asking the right questions. I use the term “researchers” loosely, in that most of the people in the case are casually involved, and don’t have a research or investigative background. It is a small group of us who have had training in research or investigation, whether through education or career experience.
Not everyone wants to be a researcher in the DB Cooper case. In fact, many people join the case for the social experience, to post memes, or simply to troll. I estimate the number of solid researchers out there on the case to be less than 50.
There really should be a bar though when it comes to actual research. We should be asking the right questions. However, the right questions aren’t enough. There needs to be follow on questions. One of my mentors in the case is Bruce Smith. He has demonstrated a certain tenacity when it comes to asking questions and talking to witnesses. He does not bow to the “morality police” who have in recent years taken a huge stance against true investigating in the Cooper Vortex.
So, what are the right questions and the right follow-on questions? What should that process look like when looking into a Person of Interest (POI)?
I’ll use Wiliam J. Smith as an example, given that he’s the POI I know the most about. However, Smith can be a proxy for any suspect.

Background:
William Smith came to light in 2018. He is a former Naval aviator and railroad worker from New Jersey.
In October of 2023, a DB Cooper afficionado named Tim made contact with William J. Smith’s oldest daughter. She was six in 1971, and from what we can tell, did not know anything about the DB Cooper case or her father’s possible involvement until after 2018. In November of 2023, she began to comment on a Facebook page that Tim created called DB Cooper: The Man in Black. Tim had asked her some questions about DB Cooper. Tim was focused on certain minor areas of the case, however these were very speculative regarding glasses and a limp. This was her response:

This response from Smith’s daughter elicited this immediate response from an Admin on the DB Cooper Facebook Group, and supposed Group Expert. Note, this “expert” has had at least three suspects that he is sure are DB Cooper. He knew about Smith in 2018, but for some reason waited until 2023 to “help” the family out. Why not before? This Admin and I were cordial until the end of 2022 when I began to ask questions about his new suspect Milton Vordahl, and he did not like that. I believe this to be the reason for his animosity.

I use this member as a reference, in that he is considered to be a Group Expert and is an Admin. If our Group Experts and Admins are not asking good questions, then who is?
This is a pretty bold statement from a supposed group expert. After years of research on the case, he has determined that because Smith smoked a different brand of cigarettes than DB Cooper, did not walk with a limp, and did not wear glasses, that he was not DB Cooper and his name should be cleared from the record, (with an exclamation point). This shows a clear agenda. Now, to be fair, he is not the only one in the case with an agenda against Smith, but he is the face of that agenda. And, unfortunately the ones who are not asking the right questions seem to be well known in the Vortex.
Clearly DB Cooper would not have continued to smoke Raleigh cigarettes, given that those cigarettes were mentioned in the information disseminated by the FBI right after the hijacking.
There is nothing that says DB Cooper needed glasses, in fact he managed to do quite well getting on the plane without glasses, and there is no confirmation that the sunglasses were prescription.
A limp could not be remembered by someone who was six at the time. How can someone remember a limp from over 50 years ago? Also, those parachutes are meant to get someone to the ground, most people who use those chutes do not get injured in the jump. So Cooper may not have even had a limp, and if he did, it went away quickly.
So why did this “expert” not ask more questions? Why say that this clears Smith when it clearly doesn’t?
Another comment that was made by Smith’s daughter was that he had a liver defect. This comment was pasted by the “group expert”.

I assume she said congenital, and not congenial like this “expert” says, although Smith may have been a congenial guy. Did Smith have this issue in 1971? If it was congenital, why was it not in his military records? How did he survive Navy basic training and all the other flight training to include survival training and parachute training? What about the G’s pulled in a Navy plane. Military flight physicals are very demanding. How did he survive the rough work on the railroad? Even with a defect, there is no guarantee that he would die from this. Who said he had this? When was it, where are the records? Did he tell his daughter this, or did she remember it from 1971? Could it be possible that his injury maybe came from jumping out of the plane? There should be more questions here. Who was the doctor, is there a record from 1971 that says he could have died? Here this “expert” is just parroting what he hears from Smith’s daughter.
The daughter has said she talked to a railroader who helped “clear” Smith. I believe that to be a man named Joe. He and I have talked a number of times and emailed, and for a few years all was good. Then all of a sudden after Smith’s daughter got to him, he blocked me as a friend and banned me from his Facebook group. The claim was that the railroaders did not know I was asking about DB Cooper. However, he knew that I was looking into Smith for DB Cooper. As early as 2019 word was out on the Lehigh Valley Railroad Facebook groups that Smith was being considered as a POI.

Here is the issue. Joe did not even join the railroad until 1975 as noted by his plaque in the Pennsylvania Railroad Hall of Fame. So, he would not even have known William Smith until sometime after that, and certainly not in 1971. Joe is a great guy and very well respected in the railroad community. I suspect that Smith’s daughter’s emotions may have caught Joe off guard.

Joe did remember the saggy neck though.

So, in terms of the sagging neck, why is there not more follow-up on this? Smith is the only suspect with an actual neck/chin issue. Every other suspect that has had issues with their neck has really just been from old age. Cooper was roughly 45 at the time of the hijacking and that is early to have a significant old age issue with the neck. But again, this has not been pushed or asked about. He even has the protruding lower lip from the 302s. This neck issue is a critical piece of the investigation and is ignored by the Smith naysayers.


Now back to asking the right questions:
Imagine if the FBI were to decide to talk to William Smith’s family today. I can see the conversation going something like this:
FBI Agent: “We are investigating William J. Smith and his possible connection to the DB Cooper hijacking case, we would like to ask you some questions. Where was he in November of 1971?”
Daughter: “He was at home here with us. Also, he was afraid of heights, and a railroader he knew said he can’t be DB Cooper, and he had a liver issue and had nothing wrong with his chin”
FBI Agent: “Ok, that solves it, we won’t ask any more questions.”
OR, Would the FBI say this:
FBI Agent: “Wait, it is 2024, how old were you in 1971? You were six? How can he be afraid of heights, he flew in the Navy on an aircraft carrier? When did this railroader meet William J. Smith? Did he know him in 1971?
What about this liver issue? He joined the Navy and there are no records of this medical issue, he survived the Navy training and the rough life of a railroader. Do you have proof of this? Did this exist in 1971?
How does a six year old remember this? He had nothing wrong with his chin/neck? Well, the railroader that did know him said he did. Also, we have a picture from the 1950s that show something wrong with his chin/neck. Do you have any pictures of your father from 1971? Oh, you do, but you won’t show us?”

The point here is that the defense of Wiliam J. Smith has been poor. The standard response is that it is not his family’s job to prove he was not DB Cooper, it is an investigator’s job to prove he was. Well, I’m doing that, and the family is not doing a good job of defending him. Most family members can easily be ruled out as DB Cooper: wrong age, wrong description, wrong experience, no grudge, no personality traits attributed to Cooper, non-smoker, etc. Once these obstacles are cleared, and it is hard to get all of these, then the burden of proof does shift to the family in defending him.
It may be tough for someone to think neutrally or critically or unemotionally. Even if someone knew their relative was DB Cooper, I can think of many reasons to not tell anyone. There is really not much upside. So, in the case of William J. Smith, if the family were to come forward and say something like “hey, we really can’t prove he wasn’t DB Cooper” then I would take a different stance, but when their defense is emotional and non-sensical and is backed up by a few Cooperites with an agenda, then as a researcher and former pseudo-journalist, I can’t back down
So, why are very few people asking follow on questions? Why take a railroader’s word for it who didn’t even know Smith in 1971? Why accept that Smith was afraid of heights? Apparently, he didn’t like to clean the gutters on his house due to this fear of heights. This is laughable. He flew in 1940s Navy aircraft. I’ve been in military aircraft and looked down off an aircraft carrier, and those things are not for the faint of heart. I’ve jumped out of planes, rappelled, high dived, rode motorcycles way too fast, and many other things, but I don’t even go up on a ladder to clean my gutters. At my age a fall from a ladder would be life changing.
I think the lack of legitimate questions and follow-on questions fall into a number of possible categories. People involved in discounting Smith and other POI’s may not ask the right questions because of one or more of the following:
- Lack of investigative skills
- Lack of critical thinking
- An agenda or lack of neutrality
- Questionable reasoning skills
- Lack of knowledge about the case
- Clouded by emotion
So, what’s it going to be, will there be neutral people asking the right questions and following up on these questions? This is not hard. This goes for many suspects. The Cooperite “Social Group” gives some people a pass, and eviscerates others.
So why accept these answers about William J. Smith? Would the FBI accept these, how about another law enforcement organization? This is the Cooper Vortex’s own version of keystone cops.
Smith is a niche suspect., there is a group that follows him and a group that has an agenda. If you do become interested in him, or any other suspect, look at what the naysayers are coming up with and then wonder why they don’t ask the right questions?
More to follow in future blogs: a lot more.
- Could William J. Smith have put out a cover story after the jump and over the years?
- Does a six year old really know what happened in 1971?
- Would a new adoptive father have done this hijacking to provide for his growing family? Was it really a suicide mission?
- Did Smith have certain personality traits that made him likely to do this hijacking?
- DNA testing
- Statements from more people who knew him
- More FOIA information
- Connections to Max Gunther’s book DB Cooper: What Really Happened
- Does a liver defect really result in death?
- Other ridiculous comments used to defend Wiliam J. Smith
- Family of Smith and other’s use of fallacies to muddy the waters: Appeal to emotion fallacy, straw man fallacy, and more.
I will continue my efforts to prove that William Smith is a viable POI, and will not allow my 1st Amendment rights be silenced.
For more information on William J. Smith’s connections to the DB Cooper case, go to www.dbcooperhijack.com.
Feel free to email me at dbcooperhijack1971@gmail.com
Postscript: Finally, as a teaser for future blogs. I found this file interesting. In 1998 William Smith contacted a lawyer in Pittsburgh (350 miles from his home) to help him request his military records. Note: The American Legion or VFW could have easily done this for him. I suspect he may have been trying to see if his fingerprints were on file or determine what his records showed. Maybe he thought about coming clean on the hijack? More to follow on this.

Updated: There was also a claim made that Smith did not wear a tie to work. How anyone remembers whether Smith wore a tie or not when the DB Cooper tie was purchased (between 1964-1971) is beyond me. The 1950 census actually shows Smith’s profession as a “clerk”. He worked for the railroad, so my assumption is that he was a freight clerk prior to becoming a Yardmaster, his final job. Freight clerks and freight agents did wear ties. See the post about the tie on this same site.






















